The Facts
- Sambor Tczew could enjoy a physical edge thanks to more rest days ahead of this match.
- These two teams have no recorded direct encounters in recent history.
Standings
Group A
| Pl | W | WO | LO | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Mazur Sierpc | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 122:83 | 9 |
| 2 | Morag | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 112:81 | 9 |
| 3 | Bydgoszcz | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 102:87 | 7 |
| 4 | Jeziorak | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79:55 | 6 |
| 5 | Olsztyn | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 112:92 | 6 |
| 6 | Grudziadz | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84:64 | 6 |
| 7 | SMS Kwidzyn | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69:58 | 6 |
| 8 | Silvant Elblag | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 89:104 | 5 |
| 9 | SMS ZPRP Plock | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 89:98 | 0 |
| 10 | Wejherowo | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 66:80 | 0 |
| 11 | Czersk | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 78:103 | 0 |
| 12 | Sambor Tczew | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 55:80 | 0 |
| 13 | Bartoszyce | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 83:119 | 0 |
| 14 | Wybrzeze Gdansk II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 54:90 | 0 |
Group B
| Pl | W | WO | LO | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Ol.Grodkow | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 113:72 | 9 |
| 2 | Oborniki Slaskie | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 109:77 | 9 |
| 3 | Swiebodzin | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58:50 | 6 |
| 4 | Zielona Gora | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 91:85 | 6 |
| 5 | Oborniki | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90:92 | 6 |
| 6 | Buk | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 63:62 | 4 |
| 7 | Gryfino | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 88:93 | 4 |
| 8 | Nowa Sol | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 101:81 | 3 |
| 9 | Real Astromal Leszno | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 91:85 | 3 |
| 10 | Wolsztyn | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 93:94 | 3 |
| 11 | Olawa | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 90:97 | 3 |
| 12 | Koscian | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 93:103 | 2 |
| 13 | SKPR Swidnica | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 80:106 | 2 |
| 14 | Orlik Brzeg | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 66:129 | 0 |
Group C
| Pl | W | WO | LO | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Konskie | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97:83 | 9 |
| 2 | Zwolen | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 81:44 | 6 |
| 3 | Anilana Lodz | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84:62 | 6 |
| 4 | Wielun | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70:65 | 6 |
| 5 | Warszawianka | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 55:50 | 5 |
| 6 | Pabianice | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 81:83 | 5 |
| 7 | UW Warszawa | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 94:87 | 4 |
| 8 | UMCS Lublin | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 91:84 | 3 |
| 9 | Trojka Ostroleka | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 113:108 | 3 |
| 10 | Lider Radom | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 99:96 | 3 |
| 11 | Nowe Piekuty | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 49:53 | 3 |
| 12 | AZS AWF Warszawa | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 75:103 | 1 |
| 13 | Strzalkowo | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 49:82 | 0 |
| 14 | Konin | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 85:123 | 0 |
Group D
| Pl | W | WO | LO | L | Pts | |||
| 1 | Olimpia Piekary | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 102:73 | 9 |
| 2 | Viret Zawiercie | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79:50 | 6 |
| 3 | Przeworsk | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71:48 | 6 |
| 4 | Palac Tarnow | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 95:74 | 6 |
| 5 | Wybicki Kielce | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 90:84 | 6 |
| 6 | Chrzanow | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 56:51 | 4 |
| 7 | Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 58:54 | 3 |
| 8 | Komprachcice | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 54:53 | 3 |
| 9 | Ruda Slaska | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 80:81 | 3 |
| 10 | Zaglebie Sosnowiec | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 77:87 | 3 |
| 11 | Zawadzkie | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 77:95 | 3 |
| 12 | ZPRP Kielce II | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 77:95 | 2 |
| 13 | Gwardia Opole II | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 53:84 | 0 |
| 14 | Zabrze II | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 67:107 | 0 |
Promotion ~ I Liga (Promotion Group: )
Social Media